Morning, all!
Last night Fyodor and crew rolled out Nmap 4.85beta7. This was because some folks from the Honeynet Project discovered a false negative (showed no infection where an infection was present), which was then confirmed by Tenable. We decided to be on the safe side, and updated our checks. 4.85 also contains several bugfixes and enhancements, such as improved error messages. We tried to find the biggest issues people were having and solve them. Here are the full release notes from Fyodor:
Nmap 4.85BETA7 [2009-04-1] o Improvements to the Conficker detection script (smb-check-vulns): o Treat any NetPathCanonicalize()return code of 0x57 as indicative of a vulnerable machine. We (and all the other scanners) used to require the 0x57 return code as well as a canonicalized path string including 0x5c450000. Tenable confirmed an infected system which returned a 0x00000000 path, so we now treat any return code of 0x57 as indicative of an infection. [Ron] o Add workaround for crash in older versions of OpenSSL which would occur when we received a blank authentication challenge string from the server. The error looked like: evp_enc.c(282): OpenSSL internal error, assertion failed: inl > 0". [Ron] o Add helpful text for the two most common errors seen in the Conficker check in smb-check-vulns.nse. So instead of saying things like "Error: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED", output is like: | Conficker: Likely CLEAN; access was denied. | | If you have a login, try using --script-args=smbuser=xxx,smbpass=yyy | | (replace xxx and yyy with your username and password). Also try | |_ smbdomain=zzz if you know the domain. (Error NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED) The other improved message is for NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND. [David] o The NSEDoc portal at http://nmap.org/nsedoc/ now provides download links from the script and module pages to browse or download recent versions of the code. It isn't quite as up-to-date as obtaining them from svn directly, but may be more convenient. For an example, see http://nmap.org/nsedoc/scripts/smb-check-vulns.html. [David, Fyodor] o A copy of the Nmap public svn repository (/nmap, plus its zenmap, nsock, nbase, and ncat externals) is now available at http://nmap.org/svn/. We'll be updating this regularly, but it may be slightly behind the SVN version. This is particularly useful when you need to link to files in the tree, since browsers generally don't handle svn:// repository links. [Fyodor] o Declare a couple msrpc.lua variables as local to avoid a potential deadlock between smb-server-stats.nse instances. [Ron] Enjoy! -Fyodor
If you have any other issues, please let us know (either here or, better, on the nmap-dev mailing list), and we’ll do our best to fix them.
How does this check work?
Some of you are probably wondering how this check works. Since I prefer to write technical details anyways (I’d make a bad magician ;) ), let’s find out!
There’s a remote Windows function called NetPathCanonicalize() that can be accessed through the BROWSER service. It takes a path as a parameter, attempts to canonicalize it, and returns the canonicalized version. This function was the target of the notorious MS08-067 patch – certain parameters could corrupt memory and crash it.
One of Conficker’s primary propagation methods was this exact vulnerability – MS08-067. In an attempt to prevent other infections, Conficker hooks NetPathCanonicalize() and effectively patches the function itself.
Before Microsoft released their patch, the function would either return an attempted canonicalization and no error code, or it would crash and not return at all (those are the checks I do in smb-check-vulns.nse if safechecks are disabled). After MS08-067 was applied, the evil-looking strings would return NT_STATUS_WERR_INVALID_NAME (0x7b or 123) as an error code. Conficker’s patch, however, returns 0x57 – an invalid error code – and a distinct signature.
So what’s this mean? It means we can send an invalid path to NetPathCanonicalize() and check the return value – no error (or timeout) means unpatched, 0x7b means patched, and 0x57 means Conficker.
And it’s as simple as that :)
Ron
Comments
Join the conversation on this Mastodon post (replies will appear below)!
Loading comments...